Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlackCoin (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:21, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BlackCoin[edit]

BlackCoin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable article about a new cryptocurrency. This is too soon at best, with the article supported largely by original research and unreliable sources. The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP notability guidelines and most certainly does not have significant in-depth coverage. I have not found much other than promotional hype in my pre-nomination search for sources, but I am happy to discuss any specific sources that may be relevant. (Note, this is from my notability survey and there is a ongoing discussion on the overall topic area. Prince of Thieves (talk) 15:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC) — Striking per WP: SOCKSTRIKE. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:47, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 16:28, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 16:28, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete wouldn't meet any SNG about cryptocurrencies. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:14, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources. The article is based on primary and unreliable sources. Retimuko (talk) 03:45, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and others above. Smallbones(smalltalk) 16:15, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete primarynews sources fail GNG. Widefox; talk 02:18, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per above, fails GNG. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.